Skip to content
Menu
Close
Washington and Lee Law Review
Search for:
Menu
About
Subscriptions and Back Issues
Joining Law Review
Podcast
Contact Us
Copyright Permission
Extension Request
Masthead
Volume 82
Previous Editorial Boards
Print Edition
Forthcoming
Volume 81:3
Volume 81:2
Volume 81:1
Volume 80:5
Volume 80:4
Volume 80:3
Volume 80:2
Volume 80:1
Volume 79:5
Volume 79:4
Older Publications
Online Edition
Developments
Responses
Student Notes
Roundtables
Death Penalty
Name Changes
Fetal Personhood
Church & State
Submissions
Print Edition
Online Edition
Symposia
2024 Symposium: Voting Rights in a Politically Polarized Era
2023 Student Notes Colloquium
Past Notes Colloquia
Past Symposia
Search for:
Washington and Lee Law Review
Search for:
About
Subscriptions and Back Issues
Joining Law Review
Podcast
Contact Us
Copyright Permission
Extension Request
Masthead
Volume 82
Previous Editorial Boards
Print Edition
Forthcoming
Volume 81:3
Volume 81:2
Volume 81:1
Volume 80:5
Volume 80:4
Volume 80:3
Volume 80:2
Volume 80:1
Volume 79:5
Volume 79:4
Older Publications
Online Edition
Developments
Responses
Student Notes
Roundtables
Death Penalty
Name Changes
Fetal Personhood
Church & State
Submissions
Print Edition
Online Edition
Symposia
2024 Symposium: Voting Rights in a Politically Polarized Era
2023 Student Notes Colloquium
Past Notes Colloquia
Past Symposia
Button
Washington and Lee Law Review
Print Edition
Volume 72:3
Averting the Inherent Dangers of “Going Dark”: Why Congress Must Require a Locked Front Door to Encrypted Data
Article
Print Edition
,
Volume 72:3
Averting the Inherent Dangers of “Going Dark”: Why Congress Must Require a Locked Front Door to Encrypted Data
Author
Geoffrey S. Corn
Published
January 6, 2016
View Full Article
Citation